User Settings

«
10
Helpful
»
2
Unhelpful
What was the historian Albert Hourani's opinion on Islamic modernism and its supporters such as Afghani and Abduh?
1 Answer
1 Answer
by
(69.8k points):

Masters in Education from Nottingham University, qualified teacher in the UK. Has studied Masters in Islamic Studies also Islamic Banking and Finance. Interests in Politics/History/Philosophy.
15 Helpful
2 Unhelpful
Albert Hourani, a British historian of Lebanese descent answers this question directly in his book "Arabic thought in the liberal age (1798 - 1939)":

"[P]olemics have their danger: in defending oneself, one may draw closer to one's adversary than one thinks.

It is significant that both his controversies were concerned, not with the truth or falsity of Islam, but with its being compatible with the supposed requirements of the modern mind; and in the process Abduh's view of Islam was itself affected by his view of what the modern mind needs. He carried farther a process we have already seen at work in the thought of Tahtawi, Khayr al-Din and al-Afghani: that of identifying certain traditional concepts of Islamic thought with the dominant ideas of modern Europe. In this line of thought:

maslaha gradually turns into utility,
shura into parliamentary democracy,
ijma into public opinion;

Islam itself becomes identical with civilization and activity, the norms of nineteenth-century social thought.

It was, of course, easy in this way to distort if not destroy the precise meaning of the Islamic concepts, to lose that which distinguished Islam from other religions and even from non-religious humanism.

It was perhaps this of which his conservative critics were uneasily aware: there was bound to be something arbitrary in the selection and the approximation. Once the traditional interpretation of Islam was abandoned and the way open to private judgement, it was difficult if not impossible to say what was in accordance with Islam and what was not.

Without intending it, Abduh was perhaps opening the door to the flooding of Islamic doctrine and law by all the innovations of the modern world. He had intended to build a wall against secularism, he had in fact provided an easy bridge by which it could capture one position after another.

It was not an accident that, as we shall see, one group of his disciples were later to carry his doctrines in the direction of complete secularism."



What we provide!

Vote Content

Great answers start with great insights. Content becomes intriguing when it is voted up or down - ensuring the best answers are always at the top.

Multiple Perspectives

Questions are answered by people with a deep interest in the subject. People from around the world review questions, post answers and add comments.

An authoritative community

Be part of and influence the most important global discussion that is defining our generation and generations to come

Join Now !

Update chat message

Message

Delete chat message

Are you sure you want to delete this message?

...