Islam refers to a communal way of living, a discursive tradition intimately tied to power where Muslims are expected to socially and territorially embody Islam (in dar al-Islam) - acknowledging, submitting and serving Allah.
Islam thus comprises an environment derived from revelation, adapting to and reflecting the needs of the times, where every individual chooses their way of life and freely lives by it.
The first manifestation of Islam was the Prophet's Medinah followed by the Khulafah Rashidah, Umayyads, Abbasids and the Ottomans, with Islam (the deen) being dismantled and disappearing in 1924.
The juristic discussions historically centered around the conditions as to when such polities and territories would be deemed Islamic. A consensus emerged that a territory could be called dar al-Islam (home of Islam) where control and sovereignty belonged to Muslims and the shari'a was implemented, whilst peripheral conditions were differed upon.
Abu Ḥanifa's students Abu Yusuf and Muhammed al-Shaybani were early jurists who systematised concepts of territoriality, stipulating the two core conditions mentioned above. The statements of jurists from across the schools of thought are listed below.
The fourteenth century Hanbali jurist Ibn Qayyim concluded:
قال الجمهــور: دار الإسـلام هى التي نزلها المسلمــون وجــرت عليـها أحكــام الإسلام، وما لم تجر عليه أحكام الإسلام لم يكن دار إسلام وإن لاصقها، فهذه الطائف قريبة إلى مكة جداً ولم تصر دار إسلام بفتح مكة
The jumhur of the ullama say dar al-Islam is where the Muslims go and reside and the Islamic rules are dominant. If people (the Muslims) reside in one place and Islam becomes dominant that is dar al-Islam. If however, Islam does not become dominant it is not (considered) dar al-Islam even if it is in close proximity to the state. Taa'if was so close to Makkah (at the time when Makkah was dar al-Islam) but it did not become part of dar al-Islam until it was conquered. (Kitab Ahkam ahl al-Dhimmah, Vol. 1, p. 366)
Qadi Abu Ya'la said:
كل دار كانـت الغلبة فيها لأحكام الكفر دون أحكام الإسلام فهى دار الكفر
Any country where the law is Kufr (disbelief) instead of Islam is dar al-Kufr. (Al-Mu'tamad fi Usul al-Din, p. 276)
Ibn Muflih said:
فكل دار غلب عليها أحكام المسلمين فدار الإسلام، وإن غلب عليها أحكام الكفر فدار الكفر، ولا دار لغيرهما
There are only two, dar al-Islam and dar al-Kufr. Any dar (domain) where Islamic law is dominant is dar al-Islam, and any domain where Kufr law is dominant is dar al-Kufr, there are only these two camps. (Al-Adab al-Shar'yah, Vol. 1, p. 213)
The Shafi'i scholar Al-Rafi'i argued:
دار الإسلام ثلاثة أقسام : قسم يسكنه المسلمون ، وقسم فتحوه وأقروا أهله عليه بجزية ملكوه أو لا ، وقسم كانوا يسكنونه ثم غلب عليه الكفار.
قال الرافعي وعدهم القسم الثاني يبين أنه يكفي في كونها دار إسلام كونها تحت استيلاء الإمام وإن لم يكن فيها مسلم قال : وأما عدهم الثالث فقد يوجد في كلامهم ما يشعر بأن الاستيلاء القديم يكفي لاستمرار الحكم ، ورأيت لبعض المتأخرين أن محله إذا لم يمنعوا المسلمين منها وإلا فهي دار كفر انتهى.
Dar al-Islam comprises three kinds: the first kind where the Muslims live, the second kind where the land was conquered and given to its people on payment of the jizya tribune, and the third kind where Muslims used to live before it was conquered by non-Muslims. The second kind explains that it is sufficient for it to be dar al-Islam based on it being under the conquest (seizure) of the Imam (Caliph) even if there were no Muslims in it. Furthermore, it is found in the third kind it is felt the historic (old) conquest of Islam is sufficient for the continuation of the rule..." (Dr Salim, Ahkam al-ahwal al-shaksiyyah li al-muslimeen fi al-gharb, p.31)
Sulayman bin Mohammed al-Bujayrimi states:
هي كلّ أرض تظهر فيها أحكام الإسلام - ويراد بظهور أحكام الإسلام: كلّ حكم من أحكامه، أو يسكنها المسلمون وإن كان معهم فيها أهل ذمّة، أو فتحها المسلمون، وأقرّوها بيد الكفّار، أو كانوا يسكنونها، ثمّ أجلاهم الكفّار
"Dar al-Islam is the entire land where the Islamic laws (ahkam al-Islam) appear and it is intended by the phrase "appearance of the Islamic laws" every law from its laws, or Muslims live there even if there were with them ahl al-dhimma (those protected by Muslim Rulers), or it was opened up by Muslims, or it was given to govern by the hand of non-Muslims or they were living there and were expelled by the kuffar from it."and it is intended by the phrase "appearance of the Islamic laws" every law from its laws, or Muslims live there even if there were with them ahl al-dhimma (those protected by Muslim Rulers), or it was opened up by Muslims, or it was given to govern by the hand of non-Muslims or they were living there and were expelled by the kuffar from it." (Nihaya al-Muhtaj)
The Fatwa-e Alamgiri, compiled by the jurists during Aurangzeb's era, observes:
"Muḥammad said in al-Ziyadat: dar al-Islam only becomes dar al-Ḥarb according to Abu Ḥanifah with [three] conditions. One is the enforcement of the laws of disbelief openly and that the law of Islam is not enforced therein. Second, that it is contiguous with dar al-Ḥarb, with no city from the cities of Islam between them. Third, that no Muslim or dhimmi remains secure there under the previous amnesty that was established before the dominance of the disbelievers – for the Muslim based on him being Muslim and for the dhimmi based on the contract of Dhimmah. The materialisation of this situation can be in three ways: either the residents of dar al-Harb gain power over a land from our lands, or the people of a town apostatise and gain power and enforce rules of disbelief, or the people of Dhimmah break the contract and gain power over their land. In all cases, it will not become dar al-Harb except with the three conditions. Abu Yusuf and Muhammad said [it will become dar al-Harb] with one condition alone, which is the manifestation of the laws of disbelief; and that is [the dictate of strict] logic."
Muhammad Quhustani wrote :
"As for it becoming dar al-Harb, according to [Abu Hanifah] it has conditions.
First, the enforcement of the laws of disbelief openly, in that the ruler rules by their law, and they do not refer to Muslim judges, as mentioned in al-Bahr.
Second, it being contiguous with dar al-Harb such that there is no city from the towns of Islam between them via whom assistance can reach them." (Jami al-Rumuz)
The meaning of rules of Islam requiring enforcement is their enforcement with power and strength, not the performance of the congregation and jumu'ah with the permission of disbelievers. The rule of Islam, and likewise the rule of kufr, are both determined by considering power, not by practice.
It states in Khizanat al-Muftin:
"Dar al-Islam does not become dar al-Harb until rules of idolatry are enforced therein and it is contiguous with dar al-Harb without any Muslim city between it and dar al-Harb, and no Muslim or dhimmi remains there secure on account of the earlier amnesty, and no Muslim or Dhimmi remains secure there over his own life except by amnesty of the idolaters…"
Shihab al-Din al-Khawarzami al-Bazzazi stated:
"The lands that are in the grasp of the disbelievers today, there is no doubt that they are dar al-Islam because the rules of disbelief have not manifested there, and in fact the judges are Muslims." (Fatawa Bazzaziyyah)
The Hanafi jurist Ibn Abideen wrote:
"It states in Mi'raj al-Dirayah from al-Mabsuṭ: 'The lands which are in the grasp of the disbelievers are dar al-Islam not dar al-Ḥarb because the rule of disbelief has not manifested there, and in fact the judges and governors are Muslims, following them out of need or otherwise. Every town in which there is a governor from the side [of the Muslims], it is permissible for him to establish the jumu'ahs, eids, hadd and appoint judges because Muslims have dominion over them. If the governors are disbelievers, Muslims can [themselves] establish jumu'ah and a judge will become a judge by general agreement of the Muslims, although it is necessary for them to seek out a Muslim governor." (Radd al-Muhtar)
The Hanafi jurist Al-Jassas notes:
"According to Abu Hanifah it does not become dar al-Harb until three things come together therein: it being contiguous with dar al-Harb & nothing of dar al-Islam exists between it and dar al-Harb; second, the rule of the people of disbelief is enforced therein; and third, that no Muslim or dhimmi remains secure there [based on the amnesty granted by Muslim powers]. When these three things come together therein, it becomes dar al-Harb, and when any one condition falls short it will not be dar al-Harb."
"This is like the town of al-Qirmiti. In the view of [Abu Yusuf and Muhammad], it is dar al-Harb despite being surrounded by dar al-Islam because the rule of disbelief has become manifest therein, since they manifest the religion of Zoroastrians, fire-worship and insulting the Messenger Muhammad (saw)."
"The reasoning behind this view is that the status of an abode only relates to power and dominance and the enforcement of the rule of the religion therein. The proof for the soundness of this is that when we gain power over dar al-Harb and enforce our laws therein it becomes dar al-Islam, whether contiguous with dar al-Islam or not; the same is therefore the case with a town from dar al-Islam, when disbelievers overpower it and their rule is enforced therein, it must be dar al-Harb, and there is no sense to giving consideration to a dhimmi or Muslim remaining secure over his life because a Muslim may be secure in dar al-Harb and that will not stop it from being dar al-Harb and will not necessitate it being dar al-Islam."
Then explaining Abu Hanifah's position, he says:
"As for the reasoning of Abu Hanifah's view in giving consideration to the three things that we described, it is that when it is not contiguous with dar al-Harb and there is dar al-Islam surrounding it, the dominance has no ruling because it still comes under the force of the Muslims so is like an army of people from dar al-Harb resorting to a Muslim fort with the Muslim armies surrounding them – their acquisition of the fort would not convert the fort into dar al-Harb while the Muslim armies surround them. Similar is a city the residents of which apostatise or its residents overpower it while there are Islamic cities surrounding it – it is obvious that the force of Islam remains there because they surround them. He also considered the enforcement of laws because the place which an army has acquired from the plots of dar al-Islam, even if contiguous with dar al-Harb, will not become dar al-Harb because they are unable to enforce their rule. Similar is the Muslim army when it enters dar al-Harb – the plot they acquire will not become dar al-Islam for as long as they are not able to enforce their rules. He also considered that there not remain a Muslim or dhimmi secure over his life because being secure over his life makes the place remain in the ruling of dar al-Islam as it was, and that would prevent it from changing into the ruling of dar al-Harb."
Al-Jassas then concludes:
"I believe that Abu Hanifah only said this based on the conditions that existed in his time when Muslims fought idolaters. It was not possible according to him that a dar al-Harb could exist in the middle of the abode of Muslims, where the inhabitants apostatise and despite the armies of the sultan surrounding them remain strong and have loyal subjects. Had he seen what has happened in this time, where people are negligent of Jihad and betray one another and those in leadership are engaged in corruption and show enmity to Islam and its adherents and belittle the command of Jihad and its due, he would say the same thing as Abu Yusuf and Muhammad about a town like al-Qirmiṭi, and in fact many towns like it which we dislike to mention here." (Sharh Mukhtasar al-Tahawi, 7:215-8).
The jurists generally understood the notion of dar al-Islam as referring to a territory where Islam could be lived securely as way of life. This required offices, institutions and structures such as governors, judges, treasury, security and so on.
The twelfth century Shafi'i jurist Fakhr al-Din al-Razi has been cited by researchers to suggest he was at odds with the other jurists. He innovatively used variant terminology, conveying the same understanding above. He distinguished between the Muslims as a "community of compliance" (ummat al-ijaba) and the non-Muslim "community of mission" (ummat al-da'wa) which was called to Islam via jihad (Vol. 8, p.196). This is consistent with the notions of dar al-Islam and dar al-Harb.
No scholar claims in the land of disbelievers if one openly conducted some salient aspects of Islam based on their clear permission or based on them turning a blind eye then it becomes dar al-Islam. Whilst it is may be claimed that the 11th-century jurist al-Mawardi stated, "If a Muslim is able to practice his deen openly in a land of unbelief, that land becomes dar al-Islam" and that this dictum was repeated by later jurists such as the 16th-century al-Ramli and al-Haytami following the Reconquista in Spain, where they emphasized former Muslim lands did not revert to being dar al-kufr unless all Muslims had left thereby ceasing the deen in those territories., this is problematic as the jurists understood "practicing the deen" to mean leaving a communal way of life and not the modern notion of a personal apolitical religion.
The intent of the enforcement of the laws of Islam, which is a condition for a land to remain dar al-Islam after the disbelievers gain power over it, is that the rules of Islam can be enforced by way of strength and power.
Likewise, in dar al-Harb, enforcing laws of Islam can remove it from being dar al-Harb when it is by way of power and strength, not merely that the ruler of dar al-Harb allows the laws of Islam to be put into practice.
In conclusion, the jurists conceptualized dar al-Islam (the home of Islam) as a territory under Muslim rule, a political entity where Muslims were secure and could practice their deen as a collective. Some focused on its legal system in their wording, a territory where Islamic law prevailed under the control of Muslims, others emphasized the lifeway, wherever Muslims could practice their deen in peace and security, free from oppression and persecution.
The general agreement however remained on the underlying meaning despite the minor variations in their wordings or conceptualisations.
Dr Salim, Ahkam al-ahwal al-shaksiyyah li al-muslimeen fi al-gharb
Al-Jassas, Sharh Mukhtasar al-Ṭahawi
Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, Tafsir al-Fakhr al-Razi
Ibn Abideen, Radd al-Muhtar
Ibn Qayyim, Kitab Ahkam ahl al-Dhimmah
Imam Shihab al-Din al-Khawarzami al-Bazzazi, Fatawa Bazzaziyyah
Muhammad Quhustani, Jami al-Rumuz
Sulayman bin Mohammed al-Bujayrimi, Nihaya al-Muhtaj
Sub Categories of Dar ul Islam:
1. Dar ul Baghi: And it is if a country is taken over by rebels and they rule in it on their own. The opposite of it is Dar ul 'Adl, and it is that which is under the control of the Imām of the Muslims.
2. Dar ul Fisq: When fisq becomes dominant under Dar ul Islam. Imam Ash Shawkani - may allah be merciful to him (ever heard of him?) stated, "And Ja'far Ibn Mubash'shir and some of the Hāduwiyyah (these are from the camp of Islam from the shia who are still muslims and are similar to the Zaydiyyah) were of the opinion of the obligation of Hijrah from Dar ul Fisq, out of Qiyās upon Dar ul kufr. And it is Qiyās with a differentiator, and the truth is that it is not obligatory from Dar ul Fisq, because it is Dar ul Islam ."
3. Dar ul Ahllal Thimmah: This is different than as Dar ul 'Ahd and Dar As-Sulh, as these are from the categories of Dar ul kufr. As for Dar Ahl Ath-Thimmah then it is from Dar ul Islam , as Khaybar was after the Muslims conquered it in the time of the messenger of allah (pbuh).
4. Dar ul Muraqbah – mixture of laws upon Muslim lands that are assimilations of kufr and shari'ah. A disputed category that is sometimes applied by some on Muslims Lands during the Tartar invasion and massacre.
· Kitab As-Siyar ul Kabīr by Imam Hasan (R)
· Ad-Durrar as-Siniyah fil Jawaab an-Najdiya, Vol. 7 pg. 353 Sheikh ul Islam Ibn Taymiyyah
Sub Categories of Dar ul Kufr:
1. From the point of view of whether kufr was originally there or if it is foreign, it is divided into:
a) Dar ul kufr ul Aslī: And it is that which was never Dar ul Islam at any time, such as Japan, Eastern China, England, the continents of North America, South America, and Australia.
b) Dar ul kufr At-Tāri': And it is that which was Dar ul Islam at one point but was then conquered by original kuffār, such as ul Andalus (Spain and Portugal), Palestine, and the Eastern European countries that were under the rule of the Uthmani khilafah, such as Romania, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Greece and Albania.
c) Dar ar-riddah: And it is a branch of Dar ul kufr At-Tāri', and it is that which was Dar ul Islam at one point, but then was taken over by murtaddūn, and they implement the laws of Kufr within it and protect the laws of kufr, like the countries to that are labelled Islamic. These states past through the stage where they were Dar kufr Tāri' when the crusaders conquered them; then they left them and the apostates ruled them after.
2. And from the point of view of its relationship with Dar ul Islam, Dar ul kufr is divided into:
a) Dar ul Harb: And it is that which has no Sulh or Hudnah between it and Dar ul Islam . And it is not a condition that actual war being waged in order for this label to be correct, rather it is sufficient that there is no Sulh, meaning that it is allowed for the Muslims to fight the people of these states whenever they want/ And from here it was labelled Dar Harb. Later, Dar ul Harb hukman & Dar ul Harb Hukman wa Fi'lan
b) Dar ul 'Ahd: And it is that which there is a Muwaada'ah, Sulh and Hudnah between it and Dar ul Islam , like Makkah between Sulh ul Hudaybiyah & Fath Makkah
3. And from the point of view of the security of the Muslim upon his self within it, Dar ul kufr is divided into:
3i) Dar ul Amn: And it is that in which a Muslim is secure with regards to his self, like Habashah in the beginning of Islam when the Sahabah made Hijrah to it fleeing the attacks mushriks of Makkah.
3ii) Dar ul Fitnah: And it is that in which a Muslim is not secure with regards to his self, like Makkah in the beginning of Islam, and like the majority of the states of riddah today.
References on these classifications include:
· Imam Muwardi - Ahkam al Sultaniyah
· Imam Shaybani - Kitab as Siyar
· Imam Hasan - Kitab al Siyar Al Kabeer 5/1689 &5/2196
· Imam Hasan - Al Mughni Ma'Ash-Sharh Al-Kabir 10/517
· Imam Shawkani - Nayl ul Awtar, 8/179.
· Sheikh ul Islam – Al Majmo al-Fataawa, 3/533-534
Great answers start with great insights. Content becomes intriguing when it is voted up or down - ensuring the best answers are always at the top.
Questions are answered by people with a deep interest in the subject. People from around the world review questions, post answers and add comments.
Be part of and influence the most important global discussion that is defining our generation and generations to come